Contents | Prev | Next | Index | Java Language Specification Second Edition |
CHAPTER 11
When a program violates the semantic constraints of the Java programming language, the Java virtual machine signals this error to the program as an exception. An example of such a violation is an attempt to index outside the bounds of an array. Some programming languages and their implementations react to such errors by peremptorily terminating the program; other programming languages allow an implementation to react in an arbitrary or unpredictable way. Neither of these approaches is compatible with the design goals of the Java platform: to provide portability and robustness. Instead, the Java programming language specifies that an exception will be thrown when semantic constraints are violated and will cause a non-local transfer of control from the point where the exception occurred to a point that can be specified by the programmer. An exception is said to be thrown from the point where it occurred and is said to be caught at the point to which control is transferred.
Programs can also throw exceptions explicitly, using throw
statements (§14.17).
Explicit use of throw
statements provides an alternative to the old-fashioned style of handling error conditions by returning funny values, such as the integer value -1
where a negative value would not normally be expected. Experience shows that too often such funny values are ignored or not checked for by callers, leading to programs that are not robust, exhibit undesirable behavior, or both.
Every exception is represented by an instance of the class Throwable
or one of its subclasses; such an object can be used to carry information from the point at which an exception occurs to the handler that catches it. Handlers are established by catch
clauses of try
statements (§14.19). During the process of throwing an exception, the Java virtual machine abruptly completes, one by one, any expressions, statements, method and constructor invocations, initializers, and field initialization expressions that have begun but not completed execution in the current thread. This process continues until a handler is found that indicates that it handles that particular exception by naming the class of the exception or a superclass of the class of the exception. If no such handler is found, then the method uncaught-Exception
is invoked for the ThreadGroup
that is the parent of the current thread-thus every effort is made to avoid letting an exception go unhandled.
The exception mechanism of the Java platform is integrated with its synchronization model (§17), so that locks are released as synchronized
statements (§14.18) and invocations of synchronized
methods (§8.4.3.6, §15.12) complete abruptly.
This chapter describes the different causes of exceptions (§11.1). It details how exceptions are checked at compile time (§11.2) and processed at run time (§11.3). A detailed example (§11.4) is then followed by an explanation of the exception hierarchy (§11.5).
throw
statement (§14.17) was executed.
stop
of class Thread
was invoked
Throwable
and instances of its subclasses. These classes are, collectively, the exception classes.throws
clause for the method (§8.4.4) or constructor (§8.8.4) must mention the class of that exception or one of the superclasses of the class of that exception. This compile-time checking for the presence of exception handlers is designed to reduce the number of exceptions which are not properly handled.
The unchecked exceptions classes are the class RuntimeException
and its subclasses, and the class Error
and its subclasses. All other exception classes are checked exception classes. The Java API defines a number of exception classes, both checked and unchecked. Additional exception classes, both checked and unchecked, may be declared by programmers. See §11.5 for a description of the exception class hierarchy and some of the exception classes defined by the Java API and Java virtual machine.
The checked exception classes named in the throws
clause are part of the contract between the implementor and user of the method or constructor. The throws
clause of an overriding method may not specify that this method will result in throwing any checked exception which the overridden method is not permitted, by its throws
clause, to throw. When interfaces are involved, more than one method declaration may be overridden by a single overriding declaration. In this case, the overriding declaration must have a throws
clause that is compatible with all the overridden declarations (§9.4).
Static initializers (§8.7), class variable initializers, and instance initializers or instance variable initializers within named classes and interfaces (§8.3.2), must not result in a checked exception; if one does, a compile-time error occurs. No such restriction applies to instance initializers or instance variable initializers within anonymous classes (§15.9.5).
Error
and its subclasses) are exempted from compile-time checking because they can occur at many points in the program and recovery from them is difficult or impossible. A program declaring such exceptions would be cluttered, pointlessly.RuntimeException
and its subclasses) are exempted from compile-time checking because, in the judgment of the designers of the Java programming language, having to declare such exceptions would not aid significantly in establishing the correctness of programs. Many of the operations and constructs of the Java programming language can result in runtime exceptions. The information available to a compiler, and the level of analysis the compiler performs, are usually not sufficient to establish that such run-time exceptions cannot occur, even though this may be obvious to the programmer. Requiring such exception classes to be declared would simply be an irritation to programmers.
For example, certain code might implement a circular data structure that, by construction, can never involve null
references; the programmer can then be certain that a NullPointerException
cannot occur, but it would be difficult for a compiler to prove it. The theorem-proving technology that is needed to establish such global properties of data structures is beyond the scope of this specification.
catch
clause of a try
statement (§14.19) that handles the exception.
A statement or expression is dynamically enclosed by a catch
clause if it appears within the try
block of the try
statement of which the catch
clause is a part, or if the caller of the statement or expression is dynamically enclosed by the catch
clause.
The caller of a statement or expression depends on where it occurs:
newInstance
that was executed to cause an object to be created.
static
variable, then the caller is the expression that used the class or interface so as to cause it to be initialized.
catch
clause handles an exception is determined by comparing the class of the object that was thrown to the declared type of the parameter of the catch
clause. The catch
clause handles the exception if the type of its parameter is the class of the exception or a superclass of the class of the exception. Equivalently, a catch
clause will catch any exception object that is an instanceof
(§15.20.2) the declared parameter type.
The control transfer that occurs when an exception is thrown causes abrupt completion of expressions (§15.6) and statements (§14.1) until a catch
clause is encountered that can handle the exception; execution then continues by executing the block of that catch
clause. The code that caused the exception is never resumed.
If no catch
clause handling an exception can be found, then the current thread (the thread that encountered the exception) is terminated, but only after all finally
clauses have been executed and the method uncaughtException
has been invoked for the ThreadGroup
that is the parent of the current thread.
In situations where it is desirable to ensure that one block of code is always executed after another, even if that other block of code completes abruptly, a try
statement with a finally
clause (§14.19.2) may be used.
If a try
or catch
block in a try
-finally
or try
-catch
-finally
statement completes abruptly, then the finally
clause is executed during propagation of the exception, even if no matching catch
clause is ultimately found. If a finally
clause is executed because of abrupt completion of a try
block and the finally
clause itself completes abruptly, then the reason for the abrupt completion of the try
block is discarded and the new reason for abrupt completion is propagated from there.
The exact rules for abrupt completion and for the catching of exceptions are specified in detail with the specification of each statement in §14 and for expressions in §15 (especially §15.6).
Proper understanding of the semantics of asynchronous exceptions is necessary if high-quality machine code is to be generated.
Asynchronous exceptions are rare. They occur only as a result of:
stop
methods of class Thread
or ThreadGroup
stop
methods may be invoked by one thread to affect another thread or all the threads in a specified thread group. They are asynchronous because they may occur at any point in the execution of the other thread or threads. An InternalError
is considered asynchronous.The Java platform permits a small but bounded amount of execution to occur before an asynchronous exception is thrown. This delay is permitted to allow optimized code to detect and throw these exceptions at points where it is practical to handle them while obeying the semantics of the Java programming language.
A simple implementation might poll for asynchronous exceptions at the point of each control transfer instruction. Since a program has a finite size, this provides a bound on the total delay in detecting an asynchronous exception. Since no asynchronous exception will occur between control transfers, the code generator has some flexibility to reorder computation between control transfers for greater performance.
The paper Polling Efficiently on Stock Hardware by Marc Feeley, Proc. 1993 Conference on Functional Programming and Computer Architecture, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 179-187, is recommended as further reading.
Like all exceptions, asynchronous exceptions are precise (§11.3.1).
If we execute the test program, passing it the arguments:class TestException extends Exception { TestException() { super(); } TestException(String s) { super(s); } } class Test { public static void main(String[] args) { for (int i = 0; i < args.length; i++) { try { thrower(args[i]); System.out.println("Test \"" + args[i] + "\" didn't throw an exception"); } catch (Exception e) { System.out.println("Test \"" + args[i] + "\" threw a " + e.getClass() + "\n with message: " + e.getMessage()); } } } static int thrower(String s) throws TestException { try { if (s.equals("divide")) { int i = 0; return i/i; } if (s.equals("null")) { s = null; return s.length(); } if (s.equals("test")) throw new TestException("Test message"); return 0; } finally { System.out.println("[thrower(\"" + s + "\") done]"); } } }
it produces the output:divide null not test
This example declares an exception class[thrower("divide") done] Test "divide" threw a class java.lang.ArithmeticException with message: / by zero [thrower("null") done] Test "null" threw a class java.lang.NullPointerException with message: null [thrower("not") done] Test "not" didn't throw an exception [thrower("test") done] Test "test" threw a class TestException with message: Test message
TestException
. The main
method of class Test
invokes the thrower
method four times, causing exceptions to be thrown three of the four times. The try
statement in method main
catches each exception that the thrower
throws. Whether the invocation of thrower
completes normally or abruptly, a message is printed describing what happened.
The declaration of the method thrower
must have a throws
clause because it can throw instances of TestException
, which is a checked exception class (§11.2). A compile-time error would occur if the throws
clause were omitted.
Notice that the finally
clause is executed on every invocation of thrower
, whether or not an exception occurs, as shown by the "[thrower(
...) done]
" output that occurs for each invocation.
Throwable
(§11.5), a direct subclass of Object
. The classes Exception
and Error
are direct subclasses of Throwable
. The class RuntimeException
is a direct subclass of Exception
.
Programs can use the pre-existing exception classes in throw
statements, or define additional exception classes, as subclasses of Throwable
or of any of its subclasses, as appropriate. To take advantage of the Java platform's compile-time checking for exception handlers, it is typical to define most new exception classes as checked exception classes, specifically as subclasses of Exception
that are not subclasses of RuntimeException
.
The class Exception
is the superclass of all the exceptions that ordinary programs may wish to recover from. The class RuntimeException
is a subclass of class Exception
. The subclasses of RuntimeException
are unchecked exception classes. The subclasses of Exception
other than RuntimeException
are all checked exception classes.
The class Error
and its subclasses are exceptions from which ordinary programs are not ordinarily expected to recover. See the Java API specification for a detailed description of the exception hierarchy.
The class Error
is a separate subclass of Throwable
, distinct from Exception
in the class hierarchy, to allow programs to use the idiom:
to catch all exceptions from which recovery may be possible without catching errors from which recovery is typically not possible.} catch (Exception e) {
LinkageError
when a loading, linkage, preparation, verification or initialization error occurs:
VirtualMachineError
when an internal error or resource limitation prevents it from implementing the semantics of the Java programming language. See The Java Virtual Machine Specification Second Edition for the definitive discussion of these errors.
Contents | Prev | Next | Index | Java Language Specification Second Edition |